The Hidden Cost of Clean Energy

Solar panels on rooftops. Wind turbines along hillsides. Electric vehicles gliding quietly down the road.

The shift to renewable energy looks like a climate success story.

But there is a part of this story that is rarely told — the cost hiding beneath the surface.

Behind every wind turbine and electric car battery is a supply chain built on rare earth minerals. And that supply chain comes with serious environmental and political challenges.

What Are Rare Earths, Really

Rare earth elements are a group of 17 metals essential to clean energy technologies.

Magnets made from neodymium and dysprosium power electric motors and wind turbines. Lithium powers high-capacity batteries used in electric vehicles and solar storage systems.

Despite the name, rare earths are not rare in nature. But mining and processing them is difficult, expensive, and often harmful to the environment.

The clean energy revolution depends on materials that are not always clean to produce.

A High Cost for a Low-Carbon Future

The environmental toll of rare earth mining is steep.

In China’s Bayan Obo mine — one of the world’s largest rare earth operations — radioactive waste and toxic runoff have contaminated nearby water sources. Local villagers have reported higher cancer rates and polluted farmland.

In Chile and Argentina, lithium extraction from the Atacama Desert has sparked protests from Indigenous groups. In 2023, local farmers in northern Chile sued mining companies over drying lagoons that once supported crops and wildlife.

Producing just one ton of rare earth oxides can generate up to 2,000 tons of waste.

That means the path to clean energy may be paved with environmental damage if we do not act.

‍

The Global Power Struggle

Today, more than 60 percent of rare earth elements are processed in China.

That gives China enormous influence over global clean energy supply chains.

When China briefly restricted rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, prices for some minerals spiked by over 1,000 percent. The message was clear: supply chains built on a single country carry serious risks.

In 2023, the United States added 36 new mineral sites to its national critical minerals list in an effort to reduce dependence on foreign sources.

For countries trying to meet climate goals, secure energy independence, and grow their clean tech industries, controlling access to rare earths has become a strategic priority.

‍

Searching for Better Solutions

There is no easy fix, but change is underway.

Recycling rare earth materials from used electronics and old wind turbines is growing slowly. In 2022, Apple announced it had recovered nearly 40,000 metric tons of rare metals from recycled iPhones and MacBooks — enough to reduce mining needs for future devices.

But recycling is still expensive and infrastructure is limited.

Researchers are also developing new battery types that use more common materials. Sodium-ion batteries, for example, use salt instead of lithium. One Chinese company, CATL, began producing sodium-ion batteries for electric bikes in 2023.

Other companies are exploring magnet-free electric motors to reduce reliance on rare earths altogether.

Governments in the United States, Europe, and Australia are investing in new mining regulations, alternative materials research, and supply diversification to reduce risk and pollution.

‍

Facing the Trade-Offs

The promise of clean energy is real. But so are its trade-offs.

Replacing fossil fuels is not enough. We also need to rethink the materials, systems, and supply chains that power the green economy.

That means acknowledging the environmental impact of mining. It means supporting research into alternatives. And it means investing in better recycling, smarter regulations, and global cooperation.

If we ignore these issues, we risk building a cleaner energy system on a foundation that is not sustainable.

But if we confront them directly, we can build something better.

A future where clean energy is not just low carbon — it is low harm, low risk, and high impact.

‍